Perry v. State

Michael D. PERRY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

354 S.W.3d 671, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1692, 2011 WL 6613288 • 2011-12-20

Citation354 S.W.3d 671, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1692, 2011 WL 6613288

Date Filed2011-12-20

DocketED 95734

JudgeCohen, Hoff, Clayton

Cited1 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Scott Thompson, District Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant., Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelpring, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael D. Perry (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order (judgment) denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Judgment or Sentence (PCR Motion) after an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).