Waters v. State

Andrew WATERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

354 S.W.3d 670, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1688, 2011 WL 6433697 • 2011-12-20

Citation354 S.W.3d 670, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1688, 2011 WL 6433697

Date Filed2011-12-20

DocketED 94993

JudgeCohen, Richter

Cited1 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Jo Ann Rotermund, Public Defenders Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant., Chris Foster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Waters appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not err in denying Waters’ request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).