Berg v. Berg

Kristin BERG, Respondent, v. Andrew BERG, Appellant

359 S.W.3d 131, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1731, 2011 WL 6755924 • 2011-12-27

Citation359 S.W.3d 131, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1731, 2011 WL 6755924

Date Filed2011-12-27

DocketWD 72917

JudgeHardwick, Ellis, Suter

Cited1 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Jonathan Sternberg, Kansas City, MO, for appellant., David R. Mitchell, for respondent.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Berg appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Jackson County denying his motion to modify the decree dissolving his marriage to Kristin Berg. In his motion, Mr. Berg sought to terminate his obligation to pay maintenance to Mrs. Berg. After a thorough re *132 view of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).