Shobe v. State

Earl D. SHOBE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

354 S.W.3d 672, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 2011 WL 6628445 • 2011-12-20

Citation354 S.W.3d 672, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 2011 WL 6628445

Date Filed2011-12-20

DocketED 96181

JudgeCrane, Mooney, Romines

Cited1 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for appellant., Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl D. Shobe appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prec-edential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).