Revels v. State

Jay REVELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

354 S.W.3d 674, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1702, 2011 WL 6638292 • 2011-12-20

Citation354 S.W.3d 674, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1702, 2011 WL 6638292

Date Filed2011-12-20

DocketED 96492

JudgeAhrens, Richter, Gaertner

Cited1 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for Appellant., Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jay Revels (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. This Court affirmed Movant’s convictions, following a jury trial, in his direct appeal, State v. Revels, 177 S.W.3d 865 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).