Redding v. Redding

Dianna S. REDDING, Appellant, v. Mark E. REDDING, Respondent

355 S.W.3d 554, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1674, 2011 WL 6989867 • 2011-12-20

Citation355 S.W.3d 554, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1674, 2011 WL 6989867

Date Filed2011-12-20

DocketWD 73652

JudgeAhuja, Newton, Welsh

Cited1 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Robert C. Paden, Jr., Independence, MO, for appellant., Brian Baltzell, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Dianna Redding appeals the circuit court’s entry of a Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc in this dissolution case. The Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc clarified that a debt secured by a piece of real property was awarded, along with the real property, to Ms. Redding. We affirm. Because a pub *555 lished opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).