Wallace v. State
Craig WALLACE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Citation333 S.W.3d 490, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1808, 2010 WL 5573663
Date Filed2010-12-28
DocketED 94435
JudgeNorton, Crane, Draper
Cited1 times
StatusPublished
Attorneys
Maleaner Harvey, Saint Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant., Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
Craig Wallace (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).