Morrow v. State
Fisher MORROW, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Citation298 S.W.3d 926, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1763, 2009 WL 4824497
Date Filed2009-12-15
DocketED 92614
JudgeCrane, Ahrens, Baker
Cited1 times
StatusPublished
Attorneys
Jo Ann Rotermund, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant., John W. Grantham, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
ORDER
Movant, Fisher Morrow, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).