Larkin v. Boyle

Shana LARKIN, Et Al., Appellant, v. Maureen BOYLE, M.D., Et Al., Respondents

304 S.W.3d 214, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1779, 2009 WL 4823922 • 2009-12-15

Citation304 S.W.3d 214, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1779, 2009 WL 4823922

Date Filed2009-12-15

DocketWD 69875

JudgeAhuja, Smart, Hardwick

Cited1 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Herbert W. McIntosh, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for appellant., D. Bruce Keplinger, Esq., Overland Park, KS, for respondent.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Jodicy Larkin and Shana Larkin filed a medical malpractice action against Respondents Maureen Boyle, M.D. and St Joseph Ob-Gyn, Inc., arising out of injuries Jodicy Larkin sustained during her delivery. The jury returned a defense verdict. The Larkins appeal, asserting five Points Relied On which challenge certain of the trial court’s evidentiary rulings, and the court’s refusal to declare a mistrial in response to improper comments by defense counsel in opening statement. After a careful review of the record we find no prejudicial error which would warrant a new trial, and accordingly affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).