Richardson v. State
James O. RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Citation304 S.W.3d 242, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1838, 2009 WL 5083434
Date Filed2009-12-29
DocketWD 70216
JudgeEllis, Howard, Welsh
Cited1 times
StatusPublished
Attorneys
Kent Denzel, for Appellant., Jayne T. Woods, for Respondent.
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
ORDER
James Richardson appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Richardson claims that the circuit court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).