McKenzie v. State

Dale MCKENZIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

301 S.W.3d 571, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1804, 2009 WL 4932740 • 2009-12-22

Citation301 S.W.3d 571, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1804, 2009 WL 4932740

Date Filed2009-12-22

DocketED 92642

JudgeCrane, Ahrens, Baker

Cited8 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant., Chris Koster, Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dale McKenzie (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).