State v. Hamm

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sharon M. HAMM, Appellant

224 S.W.3d 605, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1959, 2006 WL 3770783 • 2006-12-26

Citation224 S.W.3d 605, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1959, 2006 WL 3770783

Date Filed2006-12-26

DocketWD 66392

JudgeHolliger, Spinden, Hardwick

Cited1 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Bret C. Kaiser, Sedalia, MO, for appellant., William M. Chapman, Sedalia, MO, for respondent.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sharon Hamm appeals from her conviction for driving while intoxicated, a violation of Section 577.010, RSMo 2000. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find sufficient evidence to support the conviction and, therefore, affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).