State of Minnesota v. Roald Dean Marth
Date Filed2025-08-11
Docketa241268
Cited0 times
StatusPublished
Syllabus
The value of property obtained is not an element of theft by swindle under Minn. Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2 (2014), but it determines the range of punishment under Minn. Stat. § 609.52, subd. 3 (2014). Affirmed; motion denied.
Opinion Excerpt
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A24-1268 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Roald Dean Marth, Appellant. Filed August 11, 2025