In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.T.B
Syllabus
Police officers did not have a reasonable, articulable suspicion that appellant was armed and dangerous when they conducted a pat-frisk of the appellant because mere proximity to a suspect in an alleged crime is not enough to support reasonable, articulable suspicion for a warrantless pat-frisk. Reversed and remanded.
Opinion Excerpt
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A23-0459 Court of Appeals Moore, III, J. Concurring, Hudson, C.J. Took no part, Gaïtas, J. In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.T.B. Filed