State v. Murray
The State v. Murray
Attorneys
Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Marc A. Mallon, Bettie-anne C. Hart, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellant., Brian A. Hobbs, Leighton R. Berry, Jr., for appellee.
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
The State sought and this Court granted an emergency super-sedeas with regard to a contempt order issued against an assistant district attorney in the underlying murder prosecution. In light of the dissenting opinion, which posits that this Court does not have jurisdiction because the finding of contempt bears no relation to the murder case, we are compelled to re-examine our longstanding order declaring that all murder cases, and all interlocutory appeals in murder cases, be transferred to this Court. State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524 (1) (322 SE2d 711) (1984). We conclude that we do have jurisdiction of this appeal and that the dissenters’ position is contrary to Thornton and its progeny.
The proper focus is “on the nature of the underlying action.”
Although the appeal in this case arises from a collateral order of contempt, it is undisputed that the nature of the underlying action is a criminal prosecution. It follows that the order of contempt is a matter lying within this Court’s jurisdiction.
2. It now appears that the order granting the emergency motion for supersedeas was moot at the time it was entered. Accordingly, the original order is hereby vacated.
Order granting emergency supersedeas vacated.
Sanders v. State, 280 Ga. 780, 782 (1) (631 SE2d 344) (2006); Langlands v. State, 280 Ga. 799 (1) (633 SE2d 537) (2006).
In re Paul, 270 Ga. 680, 683 (513 SE2d 219) (1999).
Langlands, supra, 280 Ga. 799 (1) (citations omitted). See also Waits v. State, 282 Ga. 1 (644 SE2d 127) (2007).
WALB-TV v. Gibson, 269 Ga. 564, n. 2 (501 SE2d 821) (1998).