Timco v. Allied World
Date Filed2023-12-18
Docket393, 2023
JudgeLeGrow J.
Cited0 times
StatusPublished
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
KYLE TIMCO, §
§ No. 393, 2023
Plaintiff Below, §
Appellant, § Court BelowāCourt of Chancery
§ of the State of Delaware
v. §
§ C.A. No. 2023-0798
ALLIED WORLD, ARIZONA §
RISK MANAGEMENT, AND §
MARICOPA RISK §
MANAGEMENT, §
§
Defendants Below, §
Appellees. §
§
Submitted: December 5, 2023
Decided: December 18, 2023
Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellantās response,
it appears to the Court that:
(1) The appellant, Kyle Timco, filed this appeal from a Court of Chancery
magistrateās orderādated August 4, 2023, and docketed August 7, 2023ā
dismissing Timcoās complaint upon initial review under 10 Del. C. § 8803(b). The
Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Timco to show cause why his appeal
should not be dismissed based on this Courtās lack of jurisdiction to consider an
appeal from a magistrateās order. In response to the notice to show cause, Timco
argues the merits of his appeal but does not address this Courtās jurisdiction.
(2) This Court lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal directly from a
magistrateās decision.1 The appellantās right to review of the magistrateās order was
to a judge in the Court of Chancery.2 Having failed to pursue that review, Timco
waived his right to any further review or appeal.3
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is
DISMISSED under Supreme Court Rule 29(b).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow
Justice
1
Kalil v. Kalil, 2018 WL 1915123(Del. Mar. 12, 2018). 2 In re Estate of Webb,2011 WL 4838972
(Del. Oct. 12, 2011). 3Id.
(citing Del. Ct. Ch. R. 144).
2