Gold v. TOWN OF EAST HADDAM

Leo Gold Et Al. v. Town of East Haddam

938 A.2d 592, 285 Conn. 901, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 526 • 2007-12-14

Citation938 A.2d 592, 285 Conn. 901, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 526

Date Filed2007-12-14

DocketSC 18067

Cited2 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

John S. Bennet, in support of the petition., Leo Gold, in opposition.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 369 (AC 27952), is granted, limited to the following issues:

*902 Decided December 14, 2007 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18067. John S. Bennet, in support of the petition. Leo Gold, in opposition.

“1. Did the Appellate Court err in its finding that the intent of the voters is a question of fact rather than a question of law to be determined by the language approved by the voters in a town meeting?

“2. Did the Appellate Court err in failing to find that uses which are incidental and secondary to the primary public school purpose do not require the taking to occur within six months of the referendum vote?”