Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Cases

United States v. Mitchell

United States v. Rodney Alexander MITCHELL

589 F. App'x 83 • 2014-12-22

Citation589 F. App'x 83

Date Filed2014-12-22

DocketNo. 14-7113

JudgeShedd, Thacker, Wynn

Cited0 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Rodney Alexander Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Erik Sean Siebert, Office of the United States Attorney,' Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Alexander Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 3:ll-cr-00286-JRS-2 (E.D.Va. June 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.