Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Cases

United States v. Richardson

United States v. Bruce Lee RICHARDSON, a/k/a Chino

588 F. App'x 239 • 2014-12-19

Citation588 F. App'x 239

Date Filed2014-12-19

DocketNo. 14-7391

JudgeDavis, Diaz, Duncan

Cited0 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Bruce Lee Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast, Assistant United States Attorney. Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Lee Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Richardson, No. 2:06-cr-00010-MR-DLH-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *240materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.