United States v. Rutland
United States v. Quentin Orlando RUTLAND
Attorneys
Quentin Orlando Rutland, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Quentin Orlando Rutland appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Rutland, No. 5:02-cr-00031-RLV-3 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.