Charles David Merchant v. State of Alabama
Date Filed2022-12-16
DocketCR-21-0222
JudgeJUDGE COLE
Cited0 times
StatusPublished
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
Rel: December 16, 2022
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter.
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue,
Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections
may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter.
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
OCTOBER TERM, 2022-2023
_________________________
CR-21-0222
_________________________
Charles David Merchant
v.
State of Alabama
Appeal from Lamar Circuit Court
(CC-03-111.60)
COLE, Judge.
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
Windom, P.J., concurs. Minor, J., concurs in the result. Kellum, J.,
dissents, with opinion. McCool, J., recuses himself.
CR-21-0222
KELLUM, Judge, dissenting.
A petition for a writ of mandamus, not a Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P.,
petition for postconviction relief, is the proper avenue by which to
challenge a trial court's order directing the Alabama Department of
Corrections to withhold from an inmate's trust-fund account any and all
economic-impact payments received by the inmate pursuant to the
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act so that those funds
can be used to pay any restitution, fines, fees, or costs owed by the
inmate. See Ex parte Reno, [Ms. CR-20-0512, Feb. 11, 2022] ___ So. 3d
___ (Ala. Crim. App. 2022). Instead of affirming the circuit court's
judgment summarily dismissing Charles David Merchant's Rule 32
petition, I would treat this appeal as a petition for a writ of mandamus
and deny the petition. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
2