Laws Lawyers Find Laws Legal Forms State Laws Bills
Home » Find Laws » Cases Laws » Famous Trials » United States v. Nixon

United States v. Nixon

Listen
The Background of United States v. Nixon:United States v. Nixon was a landmark decision offered by the United States Supreme Court. The case revolved around the Watergate scandal, which began during the 1972 presidential campaign—a race between Democratic Senator George McGovern and incumbent Richard Nixon. On June 17 of 1972, before Nixon claimed the election, five burglars broke into the Democratic headquarters located inside the Watergate building complex in Washington, D.C. Nixon, in response to the break-in at the Watergate, appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the incident for the Federal Government of the United States. In April of 1974, Leon Jaworski—the acting prosecutor—obtained a subpoena, which ordered President Nixon to release tapes and documents relating to specific meetings between the President and those indicted by the Grand Jury. The tapes effectively revealed the Watergate scandal; the conversations contained damaging evidence involving the men and even President Nixon himself. In response to this evidence, Jaworski obtained a subpoena, which stated that the President turn over all conversations and documents linked with the Watergate scandal. President Nixon responded to this order by delivering edited transcripts of 43 conversations, which included only portions of the requested conversations outlined by the subpoena.Watergate Scandal Trial:Nixon’s attorney, James St. Clair, requested that Judge Sinica of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia terminate the subpoena; St. Clair argued that the President of the United States is not subject to the processes imposed by any court except the court of impeachment. Judge Sinca ultimately denied this motion and ordered the president to turn the tapes over by May 31st of the same year. Both sides appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which opened the trial on July 8th. St. Clair argued that the President should not be subjected to “judicial resolution” since the matter revolved around the executive branch; St. Clair felt as though the branch should resolve the issue “in-house.” Furthermore, St. Clair also felt that Jaworski did not effectively prove that the requested materials were necessary for the trial of the accused men involved with in the Watergate scandal.After the court stated that it could resolve the matter and that Jaworski had indeed provided a sufficient likelihood that the evidence contained conversations relevant to the charges, the Court rejected Nixon’s claim to an “absolute Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances.”The Case Profile of United States v. Nixon:The following is a case profile of the legal trial eponymously titled ‘United States v. Nixon’:Date of the Trial: United States v. Nixon was argued on July 8, 1974Accused Criminal Activity: The following criminal activity and charges were cited by the United States against President Richard Nixon within the appeal brought forth subsequent to the initial ruling:President Nixon was charged with coordinating the break-in of the Watergate hotel, which housed key documents that would reveal the democratic strategy for the 1972 election. United States Reports Case Number: 1039; 1974 U.S.Date of the Delivery of the Verdict: United States v. Nixon was decided on July 24, 1974Legal Venue of United States v. Nixon: The United States Supreme CourtJudicial Officer Responsible for Ruling: Chief Justice BurgerVerdict Delivered: The United States Supreme Court possesses the final say in determining constitutional questions; no individual, including the President of the United States, is above the law; and the President of the United States cannot use executive privileges as an excuse to withhold evidence that is relevant to a criminal trial.
Font Size: AAA
Loading...
  • Play
  • Pause
  • Volume:
  • Mute
  • Half
  • Max
  • United States V Nixon

    The Background of United States v. Nixon:


    United States v. Nixon was a landmark decision offered by the United States Supreme Court. The case revolved around the Watergate scandal, which began during the 1972 presidential campaign—a race between Democratic Senator George McGovern and incumbent Richard Nixon.

    On June 17 of 1972, before Nixon claimed the election, five burglars broke into the Democratic headquarters located inside the Watergate building complex in Washington, D.C. Nixon, in response to the break-in at the Watergate, appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the incident for the Federal Government of the United States. In April of 1974, Leon Jaworski—the acting prosecutor—obtained a subpoena, which ordered President Nixon to release tapes and documents relating to specific meetings between the President and those indicted by the Grand Jury. The tapes effectively revealed the Watergate scandal; the conversations contained damaging evidence involving the men and even President Nixon himself.


    In response to this evidence, Jaworski obtained a subpoena, which stated that the President turn over all conversations and documents linked with the Watergate scandal. President Nixon responded to this order by delivering edited transcripts of 43 conversations, which included only portions of the requested conversations outlined by the subpoena.


    Watergate Scandal Trial:


    Nixon’s attorney, James St. Clair, requested that Judge Sinica of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia terminate the subpoena; St. Clair argued that the President of the United States is not subject to the processes imposed by any court except the court of impeachment. Judge Sinca ultimately denied this motion and ordered the president to turn the tapes over by May 31st of the same year.


    Both sides appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which opened the trial on July 8th. St. Clair argued that the President should not be subjected to “judicial resolution” since the matter revolved around the executive branch; St. Clair felt as though the branch should resolve the issue “in-house.” Furthermore, St. Clair also felt that Jaworski did not effectively prove that the requested materials were necessary for the trial of the accused men involved with in the Watergate scandal.


    After the court stated that it could resolve the matter and that Jaworski had indeed provided a sufficient likelihood that the evidence contained conversations relevant to the charges, the Court rejected Nixon’s claim to an “absolute Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances.”


    The Case Profile of United States v. Nixon:


    The following is a case profile of the legal trial eponymously titled ‘United States v. Nixon’:


    Date of the Trial: United States v. Nixon was argued on July 8, 1974


    Accused Criminal Activity: The following criminal activity and charges were cited by the United States against President Richard Nixon within the appeal brought forth subsequent to the initial ruling:


    President Nixon was charged with coordinating the break-in of the Watergate hotel, which housed key documents that would reveal the democratic strategy for the 1972 election.


    United States Reports Case Number: 1039; 1974 U.S.


    Date of the Delivery of the Verdict: United States v. Nixon was decided on July 24, 1974


    Legal Venue of United States v. Nixon: The United States Supreme Court


    Judicial Officer Responsible for Ruling: Chief Justice Burger


    Verdict Delivered: The United States Supreme Court possesses the final say in determining constitutional questions; no individual, including the President of the United States, is above the law; and the President of the United States cannot use executive privileges as an excuse to withhold evidence that is relevant to a criminal trial.

    NEXT: Weeks v. United States

    Related Articles

    Link To This Page

    Comments

    POPULAR IN CASES

    Miranda v. Arizona
    CASES
    Miranda v. Arizona
    Weeks v. United States
    CASES
    Weeks v. United States
    Guide to Finding a Lawyer

    MORE IN CASES

    Weeks v. United States Weeks v. United States
    Operation Confirm
    Are you sure you want to delete it?
      
    Tips