Laws Lawyers Find Laws Legal Forms State Laws Bills
Home » Find Laws » Laws » Lochner v. New York

Lochner v. New York

Listen
The Background ofLochner v. New York (1905)Lochner v. New York is considered to be amongst the most landmark court cases occurring within the history of the United States, and arguably one of the most prominent with regard to labor laws enacted within the United States. Joseph Lochner, a baker in the city of Utica, New York, argued against the statutes imposed by New York legislature with regard to the hours permissible for bakeries to operate; this was in response to the Bakeshop Act passed in 1895, which prohibited bakeries to operate for an excess of 60 hours during a single week. Joseph Lochner contended that if both he and his staff willfully desired to work more than 60 hours, they should be permitted to do so in accordance with the tenets expressed within the 14th Amendment of the Constitution:The time period in which Lochner v. New York took place is sometimes referred to as the ‘Lochner Era’ due to the fact that a multitude of labor legislation was arguedThe Case Profile of Lochner v. New YorkThe following is a case profile of the legal trial eponymously titled ‘Lochner v. New York’:Date of the Trial: February 23rd, 1905Legal Classification: Administrative Law; this legal field associated with events and circumstances in which the Federal Government of the United States engages its citizens, including the administration of government programs, the creation of agencies, and the establishment of a legal, regulatory federal standardAccused Criminal Activity: The following criminal activity and charges were cited by Joseph Lochner against the State of New YorkJoseph Lochner contended that the statutes expressed within the Bakeshop Act of 1895 were unconstitutional and a direct violation of his civil liberties of ‘Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness’United States Reports Case Number: 198 U.S. 45Date of the Delivery of the Verdict: April 17th, 1905Legal Venue: The Supreme Court of the United StatesJudicial Officer Responsible for Ruling: Chief Justice Melvin FullerInvolved Parties: The following are the parties named with regard to their involvement in the Lochner v. New York case:Joseph Lochner was the plaintiff in Lochner v. New YorkThe State of New York was the defendant in Lochner v. New YorkVerdict Delivered: The Supreme Court found the Bakeshop Act to be in violation of the Constitution and mandated that the State of New York was unable to enforce labor stipulations with regard to operations not performed under duress or threat; furthermore, the Supreme Court had ruled that a State was unable to regulate legal employmentAssociated Legislation with regard to Lochner v. New York: The following statutory regulations were employed with regard to the Lochner v. New York trial:The 14th Amendment illustrates legislation that disallows the government from infringing on the right(s) to pursue ‘Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness’ with regard to any and all citizens of the United States of America – this statute is applicable to all measures of gender, race, religion, and age
Font Size: AAA
Loading...
  • Play
  • Pause
  • Volume:
  • Mute
  • Half
  • Max
  • Lochner V New York

    The Background of Lochner v. New York (1905)

    Lochner v. New York is considered to be amongst the most landmark court cases occurring within the history of the United States, and arguably one of the most prominent with regard to labor laws enacted within the United States. Joseph Lochner, a baker in the city of Utica, New York, argued against the statutes imposed by New York legislature with regard to the hours permissible for bakeries to operate; this was in response to the Bakeshop Act passed in 1895, which prohibited bakeries to operate for an excess of 60 hours during a single week. Joseph Lochner contended that if both he and his staff willfully desired to work more than 60 hours, they should be permitted to do so in accordance with the tenets expressed within the 14th Amendment of the Constitution:

    The time period in which Lochner v. New York took place is sometimes referred to as the ‘Lochner Era’ due to the fact that a multitude of labor legislation was argued

    The Case Profile of Lochner v. New York

    The following is a case profile of the legal trial eponymously titled ‘Lochner v. New York’:

    Date of the Trial: February 23rd, 1905

    Legal Classification: Administrative Law; this legal field associated with events and circumstances in which the Federal Government of the United States engages its citizens, including the administration of government programs, the creation of agencies, and the establishment of a legal, regulatory federal standard

    Accused Criminal Activity: The following criminal activity and charges were cited by Joseph Lochner against the State of New York

    Joseph Lochner contended that the statutes expressed within the Bakeshop Act of 1895 were unconstitutional and a direct violation of his civil liberties of ‘Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness’

    United States Reports Case Number: 198 U.S. 45

    Date of the Delivery of the Verdict: April 17th, 1905

    Legal Venue: The Supreme Court of the United States

    Judicial Officer Responsible for Ruling: Chief Justice Melvin Fuller

    Involved Parties: The following are the parties named with regard to their involvement in the Lochner v. New York case:

    Joseph Lochner was the plaintiff in Lochner v. New York

    The State of New York was the defendant in Lochner v. New York

    Verdict Delivered: The Supreme Court found the Bakeshop Act to be in violation of the Constitution and mandated that the State of New York was unable to enforce labor stipulations with regard to operations not performed under duress or threat; furthermore, the Supreme Court had ruled that a State was unable to regulate legal employment

    Associated Legislation with regard to Lochner v. New York: The following statutory regulations were employed with regard to the Lochner v. New York trial:

    The 14th Amendment illustrates legislation that disallows the government from infringing on the right(s) to pursue ‘Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness’ with regard to any and all citizens of the United States of America – this statute is applicable to all measures of gender, race, religion, and age

    Related Articles

    Link To This Page

    Comments

    Guide to Finding a Lawyer
    Tips